• Homepage
  • Policy Briefs
    • Policy Areas
      • 2030 Agenda and Development Cooperation
      • Infrastructure Investment and Financing
      • Social Cohesion and the Future of Welfare Systems
      • Migration
      • Sustainable Energy, Water and Food Systems
      • Trade, Investment and Growth
      • International Finance
      • Digital Transformation
  • IN THE SPOTLIGHT
  • Think Tanks
  • About
  • Contact

About
G20 Insights
  • Policy Briefs
    • Policy Areas
    • Latest Policy Briefs
  • Overarching Visions
  • Think Tanks
  • In The Spotlight
  • G20 Performance
G20 Insights
G20 Insights > Policy Briefs > Mobilizing Private Investment and the Compact with Africa: A Preliminary Assessment and Steps Ahead
G20

Policy Area
Trade, Investment and Growth

G20 Argentina

Download as PDF Download as PDF Print
Share:

Mobilizing Private Investment and the Compact with Africa: A Preliminary Assessment and Steps Ahead

  • Brahima Coulibaly (The Brookings Institution)
  • Jing Gu (Centre for Rising Powers and Global Development, CRPD, at the Institute of Development Studies)
  • Rob Floyd (The African Center for Economic Transformation)
  • Jann Lay (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)
  • Rainer Thiele (Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW))
August 23, 2018 | Last updated: December 10, 2020
Tags: Cooperation with Africa

The Compact with Africa (CwA) is a structured partnership between volunteering African countries and the G20 with the inclusion of key multilateral and bilateral partners and, very importantly, the private sector. It was launched by the German G20 Presidency in March 2017.  As of May 2018, 11 African countries are participating in the CwA: Benin, Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Egypt, Ethiopia, Morocco, Rwanda, Senegal, Togo, and Tunisia.

The CwA is an opportunity for increasing private investment (particularly in infrastructure) in Africa through improved coordination and deeper stakeholder engagement. The process can increase transparency and provide better access to information on investment support mechanisms. It will, therefore, help to continue to redefine roles of development actors, including governments, international organizations, and the private sector. An initial assessment of the CwA, one year after its inception, has indicated the need to enhance monitoring and accelerate the implementation of the initiative (Compact Monitoring Report, 2018). Based on this initial assessment and an unattributed pilot survey among private sector actors (undertaken by the authors), the T20 Africa Standing Group proposes the G20 undertake a regular private sector survey, which shall contribute to a systematic integration of the private sector in the monitoring of the CWA, and improve investment tracking.


Challenge

The challenge is to ensure successful implementation of the CwA, which requires robust monitoring and appropriate remediation – as well as stronger participation of the private sector in Africa more broadly. The Africa Advisory Group (AAG), an informal body comprising a sub-set of G20 members, the African Compact countries, the World Bank (WB), African Development Bank (AfDB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and other stakeholders such as the OECD, governs the CwA. The AAG has adopted a monitoring framework and a light-touch independent review mechanism. Monitoring takes place biannually at the time of the WB/IMF Annual and Spring Meetings and is coordinated by the World Bank.

The initial assessment of the CwA presented in Washington in April 2018 included self-assessments from eight CwA countries, eight AAG members, and a joint report from the IMF, WB, and AfDB (Compact Monitoring Report, 2018).  The Compact countries indicated that most policy actions are partially achieved (Compact Country Self Assessments, April 2018). The non-African AAG members largely reported on the actions of their (bilateral) development agencies, although some provided significant detail on private sector activities (AAG (G20) Self Assessments, April 2018). The joint report from the WB, IMF, and AfDB assessed large technical assistance programs in all CwA countries (Joint Report of International Organizations, April 2018). The peer reviewer highlighted generally that there is a rationale for enhanced policy coordination and cooperation through the CwA to foster investment and trade. Likewise, there is space for international organizations to provide greater clarity on the additionality of technical assistance to Compact countries.  For the CwA countries, the peer reviewer indicated that greater collaboration and knowledge sharing would be beneficial, and that the self-assessments would be strengthened by identifying key challenges to policy implementation. Finally, the peer reviewer suggested strengthening the monitoring framework by conducting a private sector perception survey that is specific to the CwA.

The AAG endorsed this first CwA Monitoring Report; encouraged Compact Teams to enhance the private sector dialogue in their countries; and agreed to take further action to advertise the Compact initiative to the private sector.  Enhanced private sector activity is crucial for Africa, but the trends are troubling. According to the World Bank “2017 Private Participation in Infrastructure” investment commitments in absolute terms increased for most of the world, but in Africa declined by 44 percent from 2016.  Similarly, the commitments to infrastructure financing in Africa from the private sector was only 4.1 percent in 2016.[1] The AAG agreed to have an interim monitoring system with a private-sector oriented impact assessment at the next AAG meeting in Indonesia in October with the IFC and the AfDB in the lead in compiling this assessment.

Our own analyses of the CwA suggest that the success of the initiative will hinge on whether it manages to provide practical instruments for (potential) investors. These instruments will have to be known and accessible to the potential investors, and they should be adapted to the particular challenges of the various African investment environments in a context of technological transformation. Therefore, we agree with the conclusion of the Monitoring Report that the views of the private sector need to be better represented, ideally through a regularly conducted survey.

To underscore the importance of such a private sector survey, we have undertaken a pilot survey among selected private firms.[2]  We stress that the findings of this pilot are only perceptions of the CwA and the challenges investors face in Africa. Yet, the below results highlight the potential benefits of a regular survey for enhancing and accelerating the implementation of the CwA.

In the survey, some German companies emphasized the importance of support mechanisms to target not only investment, but also trade; thus stressing the strong interdependence of trade and investment. They indicated that their investments in Africa are typically preceded by entering a market through exports. Only in a second stage were trading entities set-up; and in some cases then followed by a wider range of activities including service provision (for machines or equipment) and, albeit not too often, production. Our interpretation of this trend is that smaller firms, including many firms of the German “Mittelstand,” find it too risky to invest in unfamiliar markets. From the German interviews, it was also noteworthy that reference was mainly made to bilateral instruments, in particular export credit guarantees. Expectations from the CwA focused on potential bilateral instruments to support investment, possibly indicating the need to increase awareness of multilateral support among firms that have not yet been exposed to these mechanisms. These views are not dissimilar to the most recent IMF Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Economic Outlook (May 2018), which emphasizes that sub-Saharan African countries that have experienced sustained investment benefitted from macroeconomic stability, stronger institutions and natural resources, i.e. countries with perceived lower risks. However, the same report noted that sub-Saharan Africa remains the region with the lowest private investment to GDP ratio among developing regions.

The pilot survey largely indicated there is a lack of knowledge and understanding of the CwA among the private sector, including global firms, banks, and industry groups. Those with some exposure to the CwA indicated there has been limited and uneven promotion of the Compact and the benefits to the private sector are not clear. That said, there was overwhelming support, in principle, for the Compact with many respondents noting the entrenched challenges, including risk mitigation and access to local finance that can only be overcome with a collaborative approach among Compact parties, the private sector, and other stakeholders.

Some of the companies surveyed indicated concern with overlaps between the CwA and other initiatives, including past G7 or G20 initiatives and programs of bilaterals. However, they also felt those initiatives have not necessarily been successful, therefore are supportive of the CwA if it can succeed where others have not. Firm representatives that are also closely engaged in bilateral and global policy forums on investment and/or Africa indicated they do not see the CwA integrated across G20 government agencies, where there could be greater synergies with trade and investment promotion.

Nearly all respondents indicated they would welcome greater engagement in the CwA process, including participation in a regular private sector survey. There was a general sense the private sector supports greater efforts by all G20 members (some respondents note the increased investment from China and other G20 members) and international organizations to promote the CwA.

[1] African Economic Outlook 2018

[2] The unattributed pilot survey included firms from the United States, Europe and Africa, representing numerous sectors.  It was an informal survey with selected firms; therefore, the results are only indications of perceptions.


Proposal

Integrating the private sector in CwA monitoring and improving investment tracking

 We propose that the G20 integrate the private sector into the monitoring framework of the CwA. Specifically, we propose as a first step to regularly survey private sector actors that have engaged in—or are aware of—the CwA to better understand their perception of progress, improvements in policy reforms, and support provided by International Organization or G20 members.

The success of the CwA will hinge on strong private sector participation. Private investment is at the core of the CwA and crucial for its success. It plays a key role in an African Infrastructure Connectivity Alliance. Expanded monitoring can capture “the whole picture of the CwA,” therefore, it is important to include the views on successful practices and challenges for implementation of the private sector. It is furthermore important that views and perceptions of the private investors are taken into account with regard to the actions of all other G20 parties, including the CwA governments, the G20 members, and the IFIs.

A full integration of private firms into the CwA monitoring framework cannot stop at surveying perceptions, but eventually should track their actual investment behavior. We therefore suggest that in a second stage each participating firm reports on its activities, e.g. by stating its planned and realized financial engagement. Such a monitoring has two major justifications: first, as soon as participating firms receive any kind of public support (bilateral or multilateral) they should be obliged to document its use in a transparent manner; and second, given that the CwA’s ultimate aim is to enhance private investment, a regular stocktaking would help assess progress based on up-to-data information. This stocktaking-exercise should go well beyond showcasing successes. It should also systematically track intentions of investment that eventually did not materialize or that experienced delays. The lessons to be learnt from such failures and delays may be as important as the lessons to be learnt from success cases.

 

 

 


References

  1. All Compact with Africa documents are available on www.compactwithafrica.org The policy brief references the following: • The G-20 Compact with Africa, A Joint AfDB, IMF and WBG Report, March 17-18, 2017 • TOOLBOX: Instruments Available to Support Private Investment in Compact with Africa Countries, IFC. 2017 • Compact Monitoring Report, April 2018 • Independent Review of the CWA by the African Center for Economic Transformation, April 2018 • Compact Country Self Assessments, April 2018 • AAG (G20) Self Assessments, April 2018 • Joint Report of International Organizations, April 2018 • African Economic Outlook 2018, African Development Bank • Regional Economic Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa, April 2018


Download as PDF Download as PDF Print
Share:

Edit

Authors

Brahima Coulibaly Jing Gu Rob Floyd Jann Lay Rainer Thiele

Existing Initiatives & Analysis

Implementation Overview
Existing Agreements
Existing Policies and Monitoring
Analysis and Data

    Suggest more existing initiatives and analyses!

    Your suggestions will be sent to the authors.





    *We will only use your contact informations to contact you concerning your request. For further informations on handling your private data you can check our Privacy Policy.

    *necessary fields

    • Working Paper Series

       

       

    • Global Solutions Papers

      To the Economics E-Journal

    The authors are solely responsible for the content and their views do not necessarily
    represent the views or recommendations of their related institutions.

    Report this Page

    Latest Policy Briefs

    • 2030 Agenda and Development Cooperation
      Dealing with interlinkages – A focused approach for implementing the SDGS and overcoming the Covid-19 crisis

      In 2020 and beyond, the Group of Twenty (G20) must invigorate its implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and respond to the COVID-19 crisis. Both challenges are global in nature and require a universal, integrated, and transformative response. Thus, the G20 should: (1) reorient its political agenda following the 2019 Global Sustainable Development Report’s proposal of six entry points for transformation, and focus on the “economy and finance” and “science and technology” levers; (2) reshape its working structures accordingly; (3) act collectively toward a science-based direction for sustainable development; and (4) ensure that the response and recovery measures regarding the COVID-19 crisis follow the spirit of the 2030 Agenda, and are conducive to achieving its sustainable development goals.

      • Imme Scholz (German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE))
      • Adolf Kloke-Lesch (Sustainable Development Solutions Network Germany (SDSN Germany))
      • Robert Lepenies
      • Alex Godoy-Faúndez
      • Felix Moronta-Barrios
      • Anet Režek Jambrak
      • Armand Ketcha Malan Kablan
      • Tolu Oni
      • Moritz Riede
      • Yoko Shimpuku
      • Teresa Stoepler
    • Global Health and Covid-19
      The Covid-19 crisis and tourism: Response and recovery measures to support the tourism sector in OECD countries

      Countries have introduced significant measures to contain the coronavirus pandemic that has severely damaged the tourism economy. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimates a potential decline of 60 – 80% in the international tourism economy in 2020, depending on the duration of the crisis. Countries are moving beyond immediate, often economy-wide, support measures to develop specific recovery measures for the tourism sector, including lifting travel restrictions, restoring traveler confidence, and rethinking the future of the tourism sector.

      • Alain Dupeyras
      • Peter Haxton
      • Jane Stacey

    In The Spotlight

    Top 20 Synthesis Recommendations: Expert brief highlights major policy proposals generated by G20 Engagement Groups

    In advance of the G20 Leaders’ Summit on November 21st and 22nd 2020, a recent brief published by the G20 Research Group in cooperation with the Global Solutions Initiative highlights the 20 major policy proposals by the formal G20 Engagement Groups. An […]

    Revisiting Digital Governance

    The digital sphere of today is associated with various problems that ultimately threaten our economic systems, democratic processes and cohesion of societies. Revisiting Digital Governance, a working paper first published in the Social Macroeconomics Working Paper Series of the Blavatnik School of […]

    Global Solutions Journal G20/T20 Italy 2021 Edition

    Out Now: The Global Solutions Journal G20/T20 Italy 2021 Edition focuses on Italy’s G20 priorities, overcoming the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, Digital Governance and New Measurement.  Authors from various sectors – politics, research, academia, business, and civil society – have contributed to this multifaceted edition. 


    A Project By
    Be part of G20 Insights!

    Contribute your expertise by sharing your Policy Brief.

    contact@g20-insights.org
    • Policy Briefs
      • Policy Areas
      • Latest Policy Briefs
      • Overarching Visions
    • Think Tanks
    • About
      • In the spotlight
      • About G20 Insights
      • Contact
      • Support
    Share:
    © Global Solutions Initiative Foundation gemeinnützige GmbH  |   Legal Notice | Privacy
    We use cookies to help giving you the best experience on our website. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this.Got it! |Privacy Policy