• Homepage
  • Policy Briefs
    • Policy Areas
      • G20 Support for SDGs and Development Cooperation
      • Infrastructure Investment and Financing
      • Social Cohesion and the State
      • Migration and Young Societies
      • Sustainable Energy, Water and Food Systems
      • Trade, Investment and Growth
      • International Financial Architecture
      • Economy, Employment and Education in the Digital Age
  • IN THE SPOTLIGHT
  • Think Tanks
  • About
  • Contact

About
G20 Insights
  • Policy Briefs
    • Policy Areas
    • Latest Policy Briefs
  • Overarching Visions
  • Think Tanks
  • In The Spotlight
G20 Insights
G20 Insights > Policy Briefs > Towards a PISA-type ranking on economic inequality

Policy Area
Social Cohesion and the State

Download as PDF Download as PDF Print
Share:

Towards a PISA-type ranking on economic inequality

  • Lucas Chancel (Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI))
  • Alex Hough (Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI))
  • Tancrede Voituriez (Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI))
March 22, 2017 | Last updated: October 16, 2017

Economic inequality is rising in nearly all countries. Some nations however fare better than others and the global community could learn from successful national policies implemented to tackle inequality. Building on the SDG impetus, this policy brief calls for i) the publication of a periodical report that would rank countries over their performance in terms of economic inequality and ii) the creation of a research and policy forum to facilitate mutual learning over inequality reduction policies.


Challenge

Background

 Incisive contributions from leading economists have laid bare the extent of rising inequality around the world since the 1980s. In the USA, the bottom fifty percent of the population earned about 20% of national income in 1980 while top 1% earners captured 10%. Today, it’s the exact opposite: 10% goes to the poorest half of the population and 20% of national income accrues at the top 1%. In the United Kingdom, the top 1% income share doubled over the same period, from 6% to 13% according to WID.world data.

Inequality is an unavoidable problem for today’s leaders. A burgeoning literature demonstrates the link between rising inequality and increasing incidences of social and health problems, slower growth or political unrest. In 2015, the vitality of this issue received strong endorsement from the United Nations when its Member States unanimously agreed to commit to “reduce inequality within and among countries” in the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Target 10.1 commits countries to a reorientation toward greater equality: “By 2030, progressively achieve and sustain income growth of the bottom 40 per cent of the population at a rate higher than the national average”. Achieving this target will require a reversal of current trends in many countries, as we showed in a previous study.

The 17 global goals and associated targets replace the Millennium Development Goals. While the MDGs were essentially dictates from rich countries directing poorer countries on their development pathway, the SDGs are universal, designed to drive transformative action in all countries. Similarly, the inclusion of an explicit target to reduce domestic inequality is new, reflecting the growing recognition of the importance of the issue. Nonetheless, when endorsements from former US President Barack Obama and the Pope have ultimately failed to illicit a meaningful legislative response to reverse the current trend of rising inequality, it is reasonable to limit expectations of the practical impact of the UN Agenda.

The SDG potential

In a recent paper, we evaluate what is on offer in the UN agenda, and find that, in terms of addressing the problem of rising inequality, there is much that states can take away from the SDGs, though success is conditional on achieving the buy-in of key actors and the support of civil society.

The first major contribution of the SDGs is the old cliché, “what gets measured gets done”. Under the formal agreement setting in motion the SDGs, countries are obliged to publish standardized statistics outlining their performance in relation to the goals. Previously, countries were under no such obligation, and so it was left to universities to fill in the knowledge gap, effectively permitting underperforming countries to slip under the radar. The guarantee of standardized, comparable statistics is likely to serve as a catalyst for political action. At the very least, it serves as an enabler for civil society and other non-government institutions to hold governments to account.

Second, and relatedly, the SDGs create a forum in which countries’ performances are ranked against each other. Such comparative ranking has proven a key driver for policy in other areas, in particular the PISA rankings of education provided by the OECD. Whatever you think about the PISA ranking, its influence on education policy in both advanced and developing countries is indisputable. In the same way, the SDGs enable us to distinguish between those countries that are performing well and those falling behind, while serving to remind political leaders that inequality reduction is not just necessary but possible.

This leads to the third key contribution of the SDGs, mutual learning between countries. Under the SDG framework, representatives from all 196 countries meet regularly to assess their progress toward the targets, and governments are encouraged to produce annual reports outlining their progress toward the goals – and many have already done so. While economists can offer brilliant solutions, they often fall short of political feasibility. Creating a platform for countries successfully implementing corrective measures is therefore vital. We know that when countries have prioritized inequality reduction, like in Chile under President Bachelet, they have achieved significant success. Providing a platform for leaders like Bachelet to share their experience is a vital conduit for others to follow suit.


Proposal

Our proposal for G20 leaders

  • Publish a periodical (annual or every two years) statistical and policy report ranking countries over their performance on SDG target 10.1. This report could include contributions from academia but should eventually be endorsed by the United Nations Statistical Agency. G20 countries should take the lead on this.
  • This report would contain – or would be supplemented by a side-report on – a discussion of successful and less successful policies implemented in different countries to tackle inequality.
  • Present and discuss these reports at an annual global inequality conference. The T20 host could kick start such a conference and convene it over the first years, but it should eventually be hosted by the United Nations.

References

  1. Chancel, L., Hough, A., Voituriez, T. (2017) "Reducing inequality within countries: turning the global debate into action". Iddri Study, 01/2017.
    Reducing inequality within countries: turning the global debate into action


Download as PDF Download as PDF Print
Share:

Edit

Authors

Lucas Chancel Alex Hough Tancrede Voituriez

Existing Initiatives & Analysis

Implementation Overview
Full study available here




To the document

Existing Agreements
G20 Policy Priorities on Labour Income Share and Inequalities



More Information

Existing Policies and Monitoring
Analysis and Data
Full study available here




To the document

Suggest more existing initatives and analysis!

Your suggestions will be send to the authors.





*We will only use your contact informations to contact you concerning your request. For further informations on handling your private data you can check our Privacy Policy.

*necessary fields

  • More information on T20

    To t20japan.org/
  • Working Paper Series

    To https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk

  • Global Solutions Papers

    To the Economics E-Journal

The authors are solely responsible for the content and their views do not necessarily
represent the views or recommendations of their related institutions.

Report this Page

Latest Policy Briefs

  • Toward Global Paradigm Change

    This vision brief may be summarized by the following points. First, the crisis of the liberal world order arises from a misalignment of our social, economic and political domains of activity, along with a resulting destabilization of our physical environment. The integration of the global economy has generated problems that extend beyond our current bounds of social and political cooperation. Second, extending our social cooperation – on which basis our political cooperation can be extended as well – requires the creation of the appropriate moral narratives. These narratives must guide business strategies, public policies and civic activities. Third, these narratives must be supplemented by multilevel governance structures that address challenges at the scale – micro, meso and macro – at which these challenges arise. Finally, past human experience in developing moral narratives, supported by multilevel governance structures, suggests guidelines for a future form of multilateralism that enables us to meet this challenge.

    • Dennis J. Snower (Global Solutions Initiative)
  • Infrastructure Investment and Financing
    Policy and Institutional Framework for Delivering on Sustainable Infrastructure

    We propose that G20 countries build a robust upstream policy and institutional framework for delivering on sustainable infrastructure. Specifically, such a framework should include coherent growth strategies and well-articulated investment plans, comprehensive infrastructure plans, a sound project prioritization framework, and procurement policies that integrate sustainability criteria. Additionally, G20 countries should work with Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) to build sound platforms to bring together all relevant stakeholders to help attract and evaluate investments in sustainable infrastructure.

    • Beatriz Nofal (EcoAxis)
    • Amar Bhattacharya (The Brookings Institution)
    • Kevin Gallagher (Global Development Policy Center, Boston University)
    • Minji Jeong (The Brookings Institution)
    • Linda Krueger (The Nature Conservancy)

In The Spotlight

T20 Recommendations Realized: 2016 Hangzhou Summit

A report written by Julia Tops and Angela Min Yi Hou, members of the G20 Research Group, looks closely at the Think20 recommendations realized by G20 leaders at the Hangzhou Summit in 2016. The Toronto-based G20 Research Group published a report on […]

G20 Osaka Progress on International Trade

Dennis J. Snower According to widespread reports on the G20 Osaka Summit in the media, the G20 achieved little if anything on international trade. What received most media attention was that the G20 Leaders’ Declaration stopped short of denouncing protectionism. The resulting […]

Digital Governance through the G20 Osaka Leader’s Declaration

Dennis J. Snower The underlying spirit of the G20 Leader’s Declaration can be summarized as follows:  “We share the notion of a human-centered future society, which is being promoted by Japan as Society 5.0” (§10). This vision, along with its implications for […]


A Project By
Be part of G20 Insights!

Contribute your expertise by sharing your Policy Brief.

join@g20-insights.org
  • Policy Briefs
    • Policy Areas
    • Latest Policy Briefs
    • Overarching Visions
  • Think Tanks
  • About
    • In the spotlight
    • About G20 Insights
    • Contact
    • Support
Share:
© Global Solutions Initiative Foundation gemeinnützige GmbH  |   Legal Notice | Privacy
We use cookies to help giving you the best experience on our website. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this.Got it! |Privacy Policy